Link: James Wolcott | 'Worse than a Fool'.
A quick comment on an article by James Wolcott (Vanity Fair)
the complete text is available from the link of course.
The article refers mainly to a billionaire called Richard Rainwater who seems to be afraid of what the 'future' may bring. This man has made billions out of the strategy below, in his own words
"Most people invest and then sit around worrying what the next blowup will be," he says. "I do the opposite. I wait for the blowup, then invest."
he goes on to say
"This, (peak oil), is a nonrecurring event. The 100-year flood in Houston real estate was one, the ability to buy oil and gas really cheap was another, and now there's the opportunity to do something based on a shortage of natural resources. Can you make money? Well, yeah.
One way is to just stay long domestic oil. But there may be something more important than making money. This is the first scenario I've seen where I question the survivability of mankind. I don't want the world to wake up one day and say, "How come some doofus billionaire in Texas made all this money by being aware of this, and why didn't someone tell us?"
This is where i have to jump in and remind him that if, as has been suggested, there is a global economic meltdown does he really believe that sheets of paper, (he's liquid to the tune of 500 Million in cash), will be enough to save him, or any one else for that matter?
The fact that he is spending so much of his time reading and researching suggests to me that instinctively he doesnt.
Im not going to speculate on the may be's of peak oil or any other form of future scenario regarding the global economy all i will say is that resources (listen to Gill Scott Herons B Movie) are scarce and getting scarcer.
Money is not a genuine resource, and is of no real value. At the moment it is exchanged for material goods and services and obviously oils the wheels of global commerce but that is about the strength of it.
I had a conversation with someone a while back and the subject was poverty and wealth. The accepted view is that money is wealth and lack of is understood as poverty. Our discourse held that when you look at it natural RESOURCES is true wealth and lack of, is poverty.
After all, can you eat, breathe or drink dollar bills?
Take Africa for instance, (the subject of our discussion), poor financially but rich in resources. The story told by the propoganda machine suggests that is where poverty is at its most critical. Why is that?....................All i can say is brace yourselves for resource wars.
Recent Comments